Educational guide Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology |
english |
Educational Technology: e-Learning and Knowledge Management (2012) |
Subjects |
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHERS IN RELATION TO ICT |
Assessment |
IDENTIFYING DATA | 2023_24 |
Subject | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHERS IN RELATION TO ICT | Code | 11665206 | |||||
Study programme |
|
Cycle | 2nd | |||||
Descriptors | Credits | Type | Year | Period | ||||
3 | Optional | First | AN |
Competences | Learning aims | Contents |
Planning | Methodologies | Personalized attention |
Assessment | Sources of information | Recommendations |
Description | Weight | ||
Forums of debate | Activity 1. Social networks Activity 2. Forum Participation. Reflection. Discussion. Contribution of related materials (bibliography, concept maps, videos, images,...) Feedback |
30% | |
IT-based practicals | Activity 3. Design of a teacher training plan Coherence. Key elements: contextualization, objectives, timing, evaluation, conclusions, final contributions... |
70% | |
Other comments and second exam session | |||
As part of the continuous evaluation, in those cases in which the students make a second delivery of an evaluable activity that has been suspended or not presented, the delivery will be made, within 45 days after the end of the subject, on the date determined by the professor, only in those cases in which the student expressly contacts them to request it within the ordinary academic period of the subject. Once this period is over, it will be understood that the student withdraws and will not have the right to this second opportunity or second evaluation call. On the other hand, any circumstance of plagiarism on the part of the students can lead to direct failure of the subject, without the possibility of resorting to the second call. Finally, students are suggested to consult the specific planning housed in the Moodle space for the subject. IMPORTANT: Following the timing is a relevance evaluation criterion. |