| Educational guide Faculty of Oenology |
| Bachelor's Degree in Biotechnology (2009) |
 Subjects |
| MICROBIOLOGY |
| Assessment |
| IDENTIFYING DATA | 2021_22 |
| Subject | MICROBIOLOGY | Code | 19204112 | |||||
| Study programme |
|
Cycle | 1st | |||||
| Descriptors | Credits | Type | Year | Period | ||||
| 6 | Compulsory | Second | 1Q |
|||||
| Competences | Learning outcomes | Contents |
| Planning | Methodologies | Personalized attention |
| Assessment | Sources of information | Recommendations |
| Methodologies | Competences | Description | Weight | |||||
| Laboratory practicals |
|
The assistance is compulsory. It is evaluated the development of practices and the capacity to work in groups, a joint report of practices, and the elaboration of practice dossier of each group at the end of them. | 10% | |||||
| Seminars |
|
The assistance is compulsory. Class presentation of an article related to microbiology and food. Groups of students. The grade is saved for the second call. | 10% | |||||
| Extended-answer tests |
|
- Partial theoretical exam: approximately half of the subject matter. Elimination of matter with a grade equal or superior to seven. - Final theoretical exam, 80% of the final mark: theoretical exam of the whole contents of the subject for those students who did not exceed the partial, but for those who had an equal grade or superior to seven in the partial, the remaining contents. It is averaged with seminars and practices, as long as the theory grade is equal to or higher than 5.0. |
80% | |||||
| Others |
| Other comments and second exam session | |||
|
Second call : Theoretical examination grade + seminars grade + practical grade (saved from previous call). To average the grade of the seminars, the laboratory practicals and the theoretical exams, it is required a final exams mark equal to or higher than 5/10. It is forbidden the use or the provision of communication and transmission devices during the realisation of tests. During evaluation tests, mobile phones, tablets and other devices that are not expressly authorized by the test must be switched off and out of sight. The demonstration of fraudulent conduct of some evaluative activity of a subject in both material: virtual and electronic support, leads to the student the fail of this evaluation activity. Regardless of this, in view of the seriousness of the facts, the centre may propose the initiation of a disciplinary file, which will be initiated by resolution of the rector. |
|||
