| Educational guide Faculty of Oenology |
english |
| Bachelor's Degree in Biotechnology (2009) |
 Subjects |
| CELL CULTURES |
| Assessment |
| IDENTIFYING DATA | 2018_19 |
| Subject | CELL CULTURES | Code | 19204115 | |||||
| Study programme |
|
Cycle | 1st | |||||
| Descriptors | Credits | Type | Year | Period | ||||
| 4 | Compulsory | Second | 2Q |
|||||
| Competences | Learning outcomes | Contents |
| Planning | Methodologies | Personalized attention |
| Assessment | Sources of information | Recommendations |
| Methodologies | Competences | Description | Weight | |||||
| Laboratory practicals |
|
There will be a written test which will assess the skills acquired (20%). In particular, it is considered the cooperative teamwork and shared responsibility (5%). Finally, will also be evaluated the participation, prior preparation, daily work of the results and being on time in class. All these aspects have a value of 10% of the final grade. | 35% | |||||
| Problem solving, exercises |
|
Resolució de problemes i exercicis relacionats amb la temàtica de l'assignatura de forma autònoma per part dels alumnes. | 15% | |||||
| Mixed tests |
|
Tests that combine questions of development, objective questions, short questions and/or objective tests. | 50% | |||||
| Others |
| Other comments and second exam session | |||
|
The learning of the topics included in the subject is not exclusively theoretical: it must be at the practical level too. Hence, the subject will be evaluated by a written objective test, which will assess the theoretical knowledge acquired (50%), a written practical exam that will assess the practical knowledge acquired during practical sessions (35%) and a grade resulting from the oral presentation (15%). To pass the subject, it is necessary a 5/10; having a minimum grade of 4.5/10 in each of the evaluated parts, to be able to average with the other parts. In the second call, only the unexceeded part of the first call will be evaluated.During evaluation tests, mobile phones, tablets and other devices that are not expressly authorized by the test must be switched off and out of sight. The demonstration of fraudulent conduct of some evaluative activity of a subject in both material: virtual and electronic support, leads to the student the fail of this evaluation activity. Regardless of this, in view of the seriousness of the facts, the centre may propose the initiation of a disciplinary file, which will be initiated by resolution of the rector. |
|||
